Toll Free
877.485.1973 | T: 541.485.1973 | F: 541.683.7543
 | P.O. Box 11248 | Eugene, OR 97440
Facebook footer  Tiwtter footer  LinkedIn footer  YouTube footer  Vimeo footer  Pinterest footer

Lessons from Project Follow Through (1967-1977) for the Northern Ireland Curriculum

Kitchen, W.
This technical report offers a critique of the Revised Northern Ireland Curriculum (RNIC), in place since 2007. The author argues that these revisions have remained largely unchallenged since their introduction and rely heavily on constructivist approaches to education. The first part of this report offers a deconstruction of the curricular reforms, highlighting how elements of Piagetian, Vygotskian, and Bruner’s constructivism and Carl Rogers’ theoretical ideas about student-centered, discovery learning form the theoretical underpinnings of the RNIC. The second section argues for the importance of reflecting on lessons learned from Project Follow Through in the U.S.—namely, that a) constructivist instructional methods were found to be the worst performing methods studied in Project Follow Through, but still remain the foundation of the RNIC, and b) explicit, teacher-directed Direct Instruction was the only program with conclusive and definitive evidence of producing gains on all three areas investigated—basic academic skills, problem-solving skills and self-esteem. The author concludes by calling for a re-examination of the RNIC theoretical agenda and a redoubling of efforts to reinstate Direct Instruction into the Northern Ireland curriculum.
Research areas:
Main publication type:
Program Effectiveness
Technical Report
Revised Northern Ireland Curriculum; Constructivism
Hits: 2052

Module-Bottom-Button-A rev

Module-Bottom-Button-B rev

Module-Bottom-Button-C rev2

AmazonSmileModule 01