Toll Free
877.485.1973 | T: 541.485.1973 | F: 541.683.7543
 | P.O. Box 11248 | Eugene, OR 97440
Facebook footer  Tiwtter footer  LinkedIn footer  YouTube footer  Vimeo footer  Pinterest footer

We're currently experiencing issues with Research Areas not being categorized correctly. We're working on a solution and apologize for the inconvenience.

If you have difficulty locating publications you are looking for please see Tips for Using the Database.

Language instruction, background, and development of disadvantaged kindergarten children

Sassenrath, J. M.; Maddux, R. E.
Abstract:
This study examined the effectiveness of three language programs on the academic achievement of 98 disadvantaged kindergarten students. Each teacher chose between DISTAR, the Peabody Language Development Program (PLDP), and the Standard Method Language Development (SMLD) program for their class. The School Readiness Survey (SRS), the Wepman Auditory Discrimination Test (WADT), and the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA) were administered for pre- and posttest measures. Student achievement was also compared based on students’ primary language and gender. Results indicated that there was a significant difference in speaking vocabulary, errors in auditory differences, and errors in auditory similarities, favoring students in the DISTAR and SMLD groups. Male students recorded a significantly higher mean score on speaking vocabulary than female students, but female students scored slightly higher on all other variables on the SRS and WADT. There were no significant differences between the scores of native English speakers and English as a Second Language students. (Copyright © 2011, National Institute for Direct Instruction (NIFDI). All rights reserved).
Research areas:
Year:
1974
Main publication type:
Program Effectiveness
Subtype:
Article
Keywords:
DISTAR; language; Peabody Language development Program; Standard Method Language Development program; School Readiness Survey; Wepman Auditory Discrimination Rest; Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities
Source:
California Journal of Educational Research
Volume:
25
Pages:
61-68
Design type:
Pretest posttest control group design
Fidelity monitored:
No
Students included:
Kindergarten students, disadvantaged students, at-risk students, English Language Learners (ELL), English as a Second Language (ESL) students, low-SES students
Location/Setting:
Elementary school, rural area
Hits: 3898

Research Article Request Button newsite3

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Module-Bottom-Button-A rev

Module-Bottom-Button-B rev

Module-Bottom-Button-C rev2

AmazonSmileModule 01