Toll Free
877.485.1973 | T: 541.485.1973 | F: 541.683.7543
 | P.O. Box 11248 | Eugene, OR 97440
Facebook footer  Tiwtter footer  LinkedIn footer  YouTube footer  Vimeo footer  Pinterest footer

We're currently experiencing issues with Research Areas not being categorized correctly. We're working on a solution and apologize for the inconvenience.

If you have difficulty locating publications you are looking for please see Tips for Using the Database.

Boosting reading skills by direct instruction

Branwhite, A.
Abstract:
This two phase study examined the effect of Direct Instruction (DI) on increasing the reading skills of elementary school aged students with learning disabilities. Fourteen students (12 boys and 2 girls) described as having “major levels of retardation” participated in this study. Their average IQ was 91.64 (ranging from 74 to 108), but they were, on average two and one-half years below grade level in reading skills. Half of the students received instruction with DISTAR Reading II and the other half received instruction with diagnostic-prescriptive remediation (DPR). The same teacher instructed each group for 35 minutes a day for a total of 55 days. Due to superior gains for students in the DI group during phase one, both groups received instruction with DISTAR Reading II for phase two. As in phase one, all students received instruction for 35 minutes a day for a total of 55 days. The Schonell’s Graded Word Reading Test was administered to all students for pre- and posttest measures. In phase one, students in the DI group demonstrated significantly greater gains than the students in the DPR group. During the second phase, students in both groups demonstrated gains in reading instruction. Students who initially received DPR instruction demonstrated accelerated gains in reading skills during phase two of instruction in comparison to phase one. Results indicated that instruction with DISTAR Reading II produced a rapid and substantial acceleration of learning reading skills, and this effect was consistent with both groups. (Copyright © 2011, National Institute for Direct Instruction (NIFDI). All rights reserved).
Research areas:
Year:
1983
Main publication type:
Program Effectiveness
Subtype:
Article
Source:
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Volume:
53
Pages:
291-298
Design type:
Pretest-Posttest Control Group Gain Score Design
Fidelity monitored:
No
Students included:
Students with learning disabilities, elementary students
Other tags:
Reading, DISTAR Reading II, Schonell’s Graded Word Reading Test
Location/Setting:
United Kingdom, elementary school
Hits: 4817

Research Article Request Button newsite3

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Module-Bottom-Button-A rev

Module-Bottom-Button-B rev

Module-Bottom-Button-C rev2

AmazonSmileModule 01